According to Forbes, the nominees from the first Frame Forward Animated AI Film Festival will be shown in U.S. theaters throughout February 2026. The festival, organized by Modern Uprising Studios, selected three shorts—Thanksgiving Day, The Pillar, and So Close Yet So Far—for the theatrical promotion. The public will vote for a winner via the FrameForward.ai site, with the winning film getting a full U.S. theatrical release in March 2026. The grand prize also includes three months of unlimited access to Google’s AI filmmaking tool, Flow, access to the Weavy AI workflow platform, and a scholarship from Lighthouse Academy.
Mainstream moment
This is a pretty big deal. We’ve seen AI animation clips all over social media for a while now, but putting them on the big screen in actual theaters is a whole different level of legitimacy. It’s a statement that this isn’t just a toy for online virality; it’s a medium someone believes audiences will pay to see. The timing is interesting, too. It comes right as the tech’s hardware demands are causing real-world headaches, like skyrocketing RAM prices for PC builders. The industry is literally reshaping the market around it.
Creative divide
Here’s the thing: the reaction to AI in animation is totally split, and this festival highlights that perfectly. On one side, you have heavyweights like DreamWorks co-founder Jeffrey Katzenberg saying AI could cut production time by 90%. Some producers even call not using it “inhumane” compared to the grind of hand-drawn work. That’s a wild perspective. But then you have the artist-focused pushback. Pixar’s Pete Docter has been famously dismissive, calling AI output an “average of things,” and other directors insist studios can’t replace a single artist with it. So which is it? A revolutionary tool or a creativity vacuum?
Judgement day
Basically, this festival and theatrical run is the ultimate test. It moves the conversation from theoretical debates on Twitter to a simple question: will people enjoy the final product? Come February 2026, moviegoers get to be the jury. If the shorts feel hollow or derivative, the skepticism will feel justified. But if they’re compelling and visually stunning, it proves the tech can be a legitimate part of a creator’s toolkit. The public vote is a clever move—it’s not just industry insiders deciding, it’s the potential audience. That’s a lot of pressure on those three short films.
