According to Wired, the US Border Patrol is operating a predictive-intelligence program that monitors millions of American drivers using covert license plate readers hidden in traffic cones and roadside equipment, with some surveillance sites located over 120 miles from the Mexican border in Phoenix and near the Michigan-Indiana line targeting Chicago-bound traffic. Internal chats reveal Border Patrol agents and Texas deputies share hotel records, rental car status, and social media details of US citizens in real time while coordinating “whisper stops” to obscure federal involvement. Meanwhile, Microsoft reported mitigating what it calls the largest DDoS attack ever recorded in a cloud environment—a 15.72 Tbps barrage from the Aisuru botnet on October 24 targeting an Azure endpoint in Australia. The FBI also accessed messages from a private Signal group used by New York immigration court-watch activists, labeling the nonviolent volunteers as “anarchist violent extremist actors” in an August 28, 2025 report.
The border surveillance dragnet
Here’s the thing about border surveillance: it’s not staying at the border anymore. The Associated Press investigation reveals a system that’s basically tracking Americans’ daily routines hundreds of miles inland. We’re talking about algorithms flagging “suspicious” routes based on quick turnarounds or travel to border regions—patterns that could describe countless innocent trips. Local police then get alerts and pull people over for minor infractions like window tint or air fresheners. And what happens next? Drivers get questioned, searched, and sometimes arrested even when no contraband is found. It’s creating a surveillance net that captures everyone, not just border crossers.
Digital attacks and encryption failures
While physical surveillance expands, the digital world isn’t any safer. Microsoft’s record DDoS attack—15.72 Tbps from over 500,000 IP addresses—shows how vulnerable our infrastructure remains. But wait, there’s more: Cloudflare recently reported an even larger 22.2 Tbps attack. These aren’t just numbers—they represent the growing firepower available to attackers through compromised IoT devices. And then there’s the FBI’s penetration of a Signal group. Signal promises end-to-end encryption, so how did the FBI access those messages? The bureau calls it a “sensitive source with excellent access,” which basically means we don’t know how they did it, but they did. That raises serious questions about how secure our private communications really are.
The chilling effect
What happens when watching public court hearings gets you labeled an “anarchist violent extremist”? We’re seeing a pattern where normal, lawful activities are being framed as threats. Immigration court watching is literally observing public proceedings—something that’s supposed to be transparent. But now the FBI is circulating nationwide alerts about these volunteers. Combine that with Border Patrol’s inland surveillance, and you’ve got a situation where ordinary Americans might think twice before driving certain routes or attending public events. The legal experts aren’t wrong—this really does raise Fourth Amendment concerns. When surveillance becomes this pervasive, it changes how people behave, and that’s exactly what civil liberties experts are warning about.
What’s next?
Look, we’re at a point where both physical and digital surveillance are expanding rapidly. Border Patrol claims “stringent” policies govern their program, but when you’re tracking people hundreds of miles from actual borders, that starts to feel like a stretch. Meanwhile, the DDoS attacks keep getting bigger, and even encrypted messaging might not be as secure as we thought. The SolarWinds case dismissal might give some CISOs breathing room, but the underlying vulnerabilities remain. Basically, we’re building systems that can track everyone everywhere—and the safeguards aren’t keeping pace with the technology. That should worry all of us, regardless of which side of any border we’re on.
