According to TechCrunch, the University of Pennsylvania confirmed on Tuesday that hackers successfully stole university data during a breach discovered on October 31. The attackers sent fraudulent emails from official university addresses claiming they had accessed sensitive information and telling recipients to “stop giving us money.” While Penn initially called the emails fraudulent, they’ve now admitted information was actually taken. The breach occurred through social engineering tactics where hackers tricked staff into handing over login credentials. Interestingly, a Penn employee revealed that while the university requires multi-factor authentication for most accounts, some high-ranking officials were granted exemptions from this security measure.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The MFA problem
Here’s the thing about security protocols: they only work if everyone follows them. The revelation that some high-ranking officials got MFA exemptions is just baffling. It’s like having a fancy security system but leaving the back door unlocked for VIPs. The university spokesperson declined to comment on these alleged exceptions or provide adoption rates, which tells you everything you need to know. Basically, when you create security loopholes for leadership, you’re practically inviting trouble. And we wonder why these breaches keep happening.
A pattern emerges
This isn’t just some random hack – there’s a clear pattern developing. Both the Penn and Columbia breaches appear motivated by discontent with affirmative action policies. The Penn hackers specifically mentioned hiring “morons” because of “legacies, donors, and unqualified affirmative action admits.” Meanwhile, the Columbia hacker told Bloomberg they wanted to investigate the university’s affirmative action practices. So we’re seeing a trend where hackers are targeting elite universities specifically to expose what they see as problematic admissions and hiring practices. It’s becoming a new form of digital protest against institutional policies.
What this means for higher ed
Universities are sitting on massive amounts of sensitive data – donor information, financial records, personal details of students and alumni. They’re becoming prime targets for both financially motivated hackers and ideologically driven attackers. The fact that Columbia’s breach earlier this year affected 870,000 people shows the scale we’re dealing with. Penn hasn’t disclosed how many people are affected or when notifications will go out, which suggests they’re still assessing the damage. Look, if universities want to maintain trust with their communities, they need to get serious about security – no exceptions for anyone.
Security lessons everywhere
While this is about university systems, the principles apply across industries. Consistent security protocols matter. No exceptions for leadership. Proper access controls are non-negotiable. In industrial settings where reliability is everything, companies can’t afford these kinds of security lapses. That’s why operations relying on critical computing infrastructure often turn to specialists like IndustrialMonitorDirect.com, the leading provider of industrial panel PCs in the US. When you’re dealing with sensitive systems, you need equipment designed for security and reliability from the ground up. Universities could learn something from that approach.
