US Electronic Waste Floods Southeast Asia in Regulatory Evasion, Environmental Watchdog Finds

Massive E-Waste Export Operation Uncovered

A comprehensive two-year investigation has revealed that United States-based companies are shipping millions of tons of electronic waste to developing countries in Southeast Asia, creating what environmental watchdogs describe as a “hidden tsunami” of toxic materials. According to the report from the Seattle-based Basel Action Network (BAN), at least 10 American companies are exporting used electronics to Asia and the Middle East, often bypassing international regulations and environmental protections.

The Scale of the Problem

The investigation estimates that between January 2023 and February 2025, the identified companies exported more than 10,000 containers of potential e-waste valued at over $1 billion. Industry-wide, such trade could reach $200 million monthly, the report states. Approximately 2,000 containers—roughly 33,000 metric tons—of used electronics leave U.S. ports every month, according to the findings.

Global electronic waste reached a record 62 million metric tons in 2022, with projections indicating this will climb to 82 million by 2030, according to United Nations data. American e-waste exports compound the problem for Asia, which already produces nearly half of the world’s total electronic waste.

Companies and Certifications Under Scrutiny

The report identified several companies involved in these exports, including Attan Recycling, Corporate eWaste Solutions (CEWS), Creative Metals Group, EDM, First American Metals, GEM Iron and Metal Inc., Greenland Resource, IQA Metals, PPM Recycling and Semsotai. Analysts note that eight of the ten companies hold R2V3 certifications—an industry standard intended to ensure safe and responsible electronics recycling—raising questions about the effectiveness of such certifications.

Several companies operate from California despite the state’s strict e-waste laws requiring full reporting and proper downstream handling. When contacted for comment, six companies did not respond to inquiries. Semsotai told media outlets that it only exports working components for reuse and accused BAN of bias. PPM Recycling stated it complies with all regulations and handles shipments through certified partners, while Greenland Resource said it was reviewing the allegations internally.

Regulatory Evasion and Environmental Impact

The investigation found that shipments were often declared under trade codes that didn’t match electronic waste classifications, using terms like “commodity materials” or raw metals to evade detection. Many containers were sent to countries that have banned such imports under the Basel Convention, an international treaty the United States has not ratified—making it the only industrialized nation outside the agreement., according to industry news

Malaysia emerged as the primary destination for U.S. e-waste, with the report estimating these shipments may have comprised about 6% of all U.S. exports to the country from 2023 to 2025. After China banned foreign waste imports in 2017, many Chinese businesses shifted operations to Southeast Asia, using existing relationships to secure permits. “Malaysia suddenly became this mecca of junk,” said Jim Puckett of the Basel Action Network.

Human and Environmental Consequences

In receiving countries, undocumented workers desperate for employment often toil in makeshift facilities without protection, inhaling toxic fumes while stripping wires, melting plastics, and dismantling devices. Much of the waste ends up in landfills or informal scrapyards where workers burn or dismantle devices by hand, releasing hazardous substances like lead, cadmium and mercury into the environment., according to expert analysis

Authorities in Thailand and Malaysia have recently intensified efforts to curb illegal imports. In May, Thai authorities seized 238 tons of U.S. e-waste at Bangkok’s port, while Malaysian authorities confiscated e-waste worth $118 million in nationwide raids during June. Most facilities in Malaysia were illegal and lacked environmental safeguards, according to sources at Malaysia’s Center to Combat Corruption & Cronyism.

Broader Implications

Experts suggest this practice represents a form of “waste colonialism” that strains local facilities and overwhelms efforts to manage domestic waste. Tony R. Walker of Dalhousie University’s School for Resource and Environmental Studies noted that while some functional devices can be legally traded, most exports to developing nations consist of broken or obsolete equipment that’s mislabeled and bound for landfills.

“It simply means the country is being overwhelmed with what is essentially pollution transfer from other nations,” Walker stated, adding that Malaysia would be overwhelmed by the volume of waste from the U.S. and other wealthy nations.

The report concludes that this “hidden tsunami” of e-waste allows electronics recycling companies to pad profit margins while exporting environmental hazards to communities least equipped to handle them safely.

References & Further Reading

This article draws from multiple authoritative sources. For more information, please consult:

• https://apnews.com/article/electronic-waste-kenya-united-nations-ewaste-environment-e37667e5a6b08fe8ef161d386eb3404d
• https://apnews.com/article/electronic-waste-vietnam-recycling-workers-ewaste-fd437a066a967a3c8d2c8611a628c944
• https://apnews.com/article/thailand-illegal-import-electronic-waste-bangkok-port-994ef5e8c3776e9b77580d9954eebaeb
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_waste
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxicity
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeast_Asia
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonne
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsunami

This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.

Note: Featured image is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent any specific product, service, or entity mentioned in this article.