According to SpaceNews, the number of active satellites in low Earth orbit has exploded from under 1,000 in 2019 to more than 10,000 today, with forecasts predicting at least 70,000 by 2030. This massive growth has created a crowded, fragmented market of space domain awareness platforms that produce overlapping data streams and inconsistent alerts. Joe Chan of the Space Data Association says operators are facing “too much information” and don’t know what to do with conflicting warnings from multiple sources. Tony Frazier of LeoLabs notes that almost half of future satellites will be operated by U.S. adversaries, primarily China, making space a “contested domain.” The industry is now pushing toward an air traffic control model for space built on shared standards and federated networks, with U.S. government initiatives like TraCSS adding momentum to these efforts.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
Too Many Cooks in the Orbital Kitchen
Here’s the thing – we’ve basically created a Tower of Babel for space traffic. You’ve got different companies using different sensors, different catalogs, different analytics. They’re all shouting warnings at satellite operators who then have to figure out which alerts to trust. It’s like having ten different GPS apps telling you to take different routes to the same destination.
Diana Klochkova from Privateer put it perfectly: “Progress has been slow, and the need is immediate.” Governments are trying to get their act together, but in the meantime, commercial players are rushing to fill the gap. The problem is, everyone’s building their own proprietary solution rather than working on interoperability from the start.
The Consolidation That’s Probably Coming
Look, this market can’t support dozens of competing platforms forever. Klochkova acknowledges the market will have to consolidate as roles and specializations shake out. We’re seeing the classic tech industry pattern – initial explosion of innovation followed by inevitable consolidation.
Armand Musey from Summit Ridge Group points out this isn’t even new. “The same ideas from 25-30 years ago are still recycled today,” he says. The industry keeps chasing the next big sensor breakthrough, then retreating to focus on analytics when the promised revolution doesn’t materialize. They’re still searching for that killer app that will define the market.
Who Actually Survives the Shakeout?
So which companies are positioned to come out on top? The ones that can actually make sense of all this data rather than just collecting more of it. Imane Marouf from Ecosmic says the value lies in “insight and the ability to react to threats in the most informed and responsive way.”
We’re seeing companies segment into three clear groups: data providers, processors who offer analytic software, and operational providers who run monitoring services. Jim Cooper from Comspoc thinks there’s room for multiple players long-term, but they’ll need to bring something distinct to the table. The winners will be the ones who can bridge the data ecosystem rather than trying to dominate it.
The Air Traffic Control Future
What’s emerging is essentially a race to build the first viable air traffic control system for space. Companies like Neuraspace are using AI-native, API-based architectures to automate conjunction assessments and plan maneuvers. LeoLabs is leveraging machine learning to prioritize which objects need observation and detect maneuvers within hours instead of days.
But here’s the real challenge: we’re not just dealing with commercial operators anymore. When nearly half the satellites belong to geopolitical adversaries, this becomes a national security issue. The future likely involves federated, interoperable nodes that respect sovereignty while enabling coordination. It’s a delicate balance – and one we need to get right before we have a real crisis in orbit.
