South Korea’s 52-Hour Workweek Creates Tension in Global Tech Race

Global Tech Competition Clashes With Work Hour Regulations

As the deep tech revolution accelerates across semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing, South Korean technology companies are grappling with the constraints of the country’s 52-hour workweek limit, according to industry analysis. The regulation, which fully took effect in January 2025 after being gradually implemented since 2018, restricts weekly work to 52 hours including overtime, creating tension between labor protections and global competitiveness demands.

Global Tech Competition Clashes With Work Hour Regulations
Investors Voice Concerns About Innovation Pace
Tech Leaders Advocate for Flexibility
Special Exemptions See Limited Adoption
Global Context Shows Regulatory Spectrum
Employee Perspectives Vary
Compliance Reality Differs From Theory

Investors Voice Concerns About Innovation Pace

Venture capital firms investing in South Korea’s deep tech sector report that the work hour limitations are becoming a consideration in investment decisions, sources indicate. Yongkwan Lee, CEO of Bluepoint Partners, told TechCrunch that “the 52-hour workweek is indeed a challenging factor when making investment decisions in deep tech sectors,” particularly in globally competitive fields like semiconductors and AI where development timelines are critical.

Analysts suggest that early-stage technology companies often face intense workloads during crucial growth phases, and strict hour limitations could potentially slow progress toward key business milestones. According to the report, this concern is especially relevant for startups developing technologies that require sustained creative focus and unpredictable breakthrough moments.

Tech Leaders Advocate for Flexibility

Engineering professionals in South Korea’s tech sector describe the regulatory environment as sometimes counterproductive to innovation. Bohyung Kim, CTO of AI startup LeMong, explained that “engineers work to find practical solutions to complex problems” and that rigid time constraints can disrupt creative flow during critical development periods.

Industry leaders are proposing alternative approaches that would maintain worker protections while accommodating the variable nature of technology development. Huiyong Lee, co-founder of LeMong, suggested that a monthly averaging system would better serve deep tech companies, allowing for intensive periods before product launches followed by lighter workloads during stabilization phases.

“A system with monthly flexibility would allow us to work around 60 hours per week before a launch and 40 hours per week afterward, maintaining an average of 52 hours while ensuring operational efficiency,” Lee stated in the report.

Special Exemptions See Limited Adoption

Earlier this year, South Korea introduced a special extended work program permitting up to 64 hours weekly with both worker consent and government approval. For deep tech sectors like semiconductors, approval periods were reportedly extended from three to six months temporarily. However, local media reports indicate that only a few companies have actually utilized these exemptions.

The South Korean government now plans to scale back these special exemptions and tighten working-hour regulations further, according to the analysis, despite some lawmakers arguing that current guidelines are sufficient.

Global Context Shows Regulatory Spectrum

When compared internationally, South Korea’s 52-hour cap positions the country between more flexible and more restrictive regimes. Analysis of global standards shows the U.S. maintains a 40-hour standard workweek with no cap on total hours but requires overtime pay, while European nations typically enforce stricter limits ranging from 33 to 48 hours.

Singapore’s workweek extends to 44 hours with potential overtime bringing the maximum to approximately 62 hours weekly, while Japan limits overtime to 45 hours monthly under normal circumstances. China maintains a standard 40-hour week with premium overtime pay rates similar to other developed economies.

Employee Perspectives Vary

Despite concerns from management, surveys indicate significant employee willingness to work beyond standard limits when properly compensated. According to local reports, 70.4% of startup employees responded that they would work an additional 52 hours weekly if adequate compensation was provided.

Kim of LeMong noted that high-performing team members often voluntarily work longer hours, motivated by performance recognition, technical contribution acknowledgment, and career advancement opportunities rather than direct overtime payment.

Compliance Reality Differs From Theory

Another Seoul-based venture capitalist downplayed the immediate impact of the regulations, noting that “many venture companies today do not strictly track employees’ working hours” and that there’s reportedly no requirement for companies to submit formal evidence proving compliance with the 52-hour limit.

The investor suggested that the greater regulatory challenge lies in labor-intensive industries like logistics and manufacturing, where the 52-hour workweek can significantly increase operational costs through mandatory overtime payments.

As the global technology race intensifies, South Korean companies continue navigating the delicate balance between worker protections and the demanding innovation cycles required to compete internationally, with the debate over optimal work hour regulations likely to continue evolving.

References

This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.

Note: Featured image is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent any specific product, service, or entity mentioned in this article.

Larry Ellison’s fortune reportedly decreased by approximately $24 billion following Oracle’s stock decline, according to analyst reports. The drop comes amid questions about the company’s capital expenditure plans despite continued optimism about cloud infrastructure growth. Ellison remains the world’s second-wealthiest person with an estimated $350.6 billion net worth.

Oracle Shares Slide Impacts Founder’s Wealth

Larry Ellison’s substantial net worth reportedly decreased by approximately $24.1 billion following a recent decline in Oracle Corporation shares, according to financial analysts. The technology billionaire, who holds about 41% equity in the company he co-founded, saw his fortune drop to an estimated $350.6 billion, sources indicate.